Lesson 1

Mirrors Ch3: Light Load — How Closed-Loop Responds

In Ch3, R=100Ω caused open-loop output to rise to 8.2V. Under same conditions, closed-loop output≈6.3V — error reduced from +37% to +4%.

Recall Ch3 Lesson 1: load changes from 10Ω to 100Ω, open-loop enters DCM, output rises to 8.2V. Now the same conditions, but the circuit has a feedback loop — divider senses Vout, comparator auto-adjusts PWM width.

Result: closed-loop output≈6.3V. Much better than open-loop 8.2V — deviation compressed from 2.2V to 0.3V, 88% improvement.

What is feedback doing? Vout rises → divider output rises → error amplifier (VCVS) output decreases → comparator duty cycle decreases → D drops → Vout pulled back. High-gain error amplifier makes correction more forceful.

Why is reference v3 set to 0.45V? Design derivation: the divider at target Vout=6V gives Vfb = 6/12 = 0.5V. The VCVS (gain=-10) computes control voltage = |gain| × (Vfb − Vref) = 10 × (0.5 − 0.45) = 0.5V. This 0.5V compared against the sawtooth (0–1V) produces exactly 50% duty cycle → D=50% → Vout = 0.5×12 = 6V. Formula: Vref = Vfb_target − D_target/|gain| = 0.5 − 0.5/10 = 0.45V.

Closed-Loop vs Light Load: R=100Ω

R=100Ω, closed-loop. Output≈6.3V (open-loop was 8.2V). Feedback compresses deviation from 2.2V to 0.3V.

After reading this section, run the simulation and observe the waveforms. To explore further, open the example in a standalone page.

Key Takeaways

  • Same R=100Ω: open-loop 8.2V vs closed-loop 6.3V (error from +37% to +4%)
  • Feedback auto-reduces D to suppress output rise
  • Higher gain can further reduce error, but requires compensation network for stability — topic of next chapter

Watch Items

  • out steady state ≈6.3V — nearly 2V lower than Ch3's 8.2V
  • Compare with Ch3 Lesson 1 waveform: still enters DCM, but output is pulled back somewhat